“[6] … The said judge should, when considering such application, first identify whether the judgment in default is a regular or irregular judgment. It is well settled that if the judgment is irregular then the respondent is entitled to have the judgment set aside ex debitio justitiae. If it is regularly obtained, then the principle expounded in Evans v. Bartlam [1937] AC 473, as confirmed by the Federal Court in Hasil Bumi Perumahan Sdn Bhd & Ors v United Malayan Banking Corp Bhd [1994] 1 CLJ 328, applies. …”
Mirra Sdn Bhd v The Ayer Molek Rubber Company Bhd [2008]3 CLJ 273
Mirra Sdn Bhd v The Ayer Molek Rubber Company Bhd [2008]3 CLJ 273
