Blog

Case Summary: Malaysia British Assurance Bhd v. Syarikat Pembenaan Karun Sdn Bhd [2008] 3 MLRA 364

1. Case Information Court: Court of Appeal, Putrajaya. Coram: Raus Sharif, Abdull Hamid Embong, Ahmad Maarop JJCA. Decision Date: 6 August 2008. Parties: Malaysia British Assurance Bhd (Appellant/Insurer) vs. Syarikat Pembenaan Karun Sdn Bhd (Respondent/Contractor). 2. Background and Facts The respondent was appointed by the Government of Malaysia to construct a road and bridge in Sabah. Per the letter of … Continue reading Case Summary: Malaysia British Assurance Bhd v. Syarikat Pembenaan Karun Sdn Bhd [2008] 3 MLRA 364

Case Summary: Nikodemus Ak Singai & Ors v. Indranika Jaya Sdn Bhd [2023] 3 MLRA 770

1. Case Information Court: Court of Appeal, Putrajaya. Coram: Lee Swee Seng, Supang Lian, M. Gunalan JJCA. Decision Date: 10 January 2023. Parties: Nikodemus Ak Singai & Ors (Appellants/Natives) vs. Indranika Jaya Sdn Bhd (Respondent/Registered Lessee). 2. Background and Facts This dispute arose after the Sarawak State and its agencies issued a lease to a private company (Indranika Jaya) over … Continue reading Case Summary: Nikodemus Ak Singai & Ors v. Indranika Jaya Sdn Bhd [2023] 3 MLRA 770

Understanding Directors’ Right of Inspection in Corporate Governance

In the complex theatre of corporate governance, information is the primary currency. For a director to navigate their fiduciary duties—acting in the best interest of the company with reasonable care, skill, and diligence—they must be fully apprised of the company’s financial health and operational pulse. This necessity is protected by a legal cornerstone often described … Continue reading Understanding Directors’ Right of Inspection in Corporate Governance

Case Summary: Luggage Distributors (M) Sdn Bhd v. Tan Hor Teng @ Tan Tien Chi & Anor [1995] 1 MLRA 225

1. Background and Facts The appellant, the registered proprietor of a shop-house in Bangsar Baru, entered into a tenancy agreement with the respondents for the ground floor for a period of two years "plus a further 2 years option". Following a subsequent sale agreement between the appellant and a third party (Quill Construction Sdn Bhd), the … Continue reading Case Summary: Luggage Distributors (M) Sdn Bhd v. Tan Hor Teng @ Tan Tien Chi & Anor [1995] 1 MLRA 225

Case Summary: China Road & Bridge Corporation & Anor v. DCX Technologies Sdn Bhd [2014] 5 MLRA 289

1. Case Information Court: Court of Appeal, Putrajaya. Coram: Aziah Ali, Hamid Sultan Abu Backer, Umi Kalthum Abdul Majid JJCA. Decision Date: 9 May 2014. Parties: China Road & Bridge Corporation & Anor (Appellants/1st and 2nd Defendants) vs. DCX Technologies Sdn Bhd (Respondent/Plaintiff). 2. Background and Facts The Plaintiff and 1st Defendant entered into a memorandum of agreement (MoA) to … Continue reading Case Summary: China Road & Bridge Corporation & Anor v. DCX Technologies Sdn Bhd [2014] 5 MLRA 289

Case Summary: Kimlin Housing Development Sdn Bhd v. Bank Bumiputra Malaysia Bhd & Ors [1997] 1 MLRA 267

1. Case Information Court: Supreme Court, Kuala Lumpur. Coram: Lamin Mohd Yunus PCA, Edgar Joseph Jr FCJ, NH Chan JCA. Decision Date: 24 May 1997. Parties: Kimlin Housing Development Sdn Bhd (Appellant/Borrower Company) vs. Bank Bumiputra Malaysia Bhd & Ors (Respondents/Bank and Receivers & Managers). 2. Background and Facts The Appellant, a registered proprietor of various lands, executed two legal … Continue reading Case Summary: Kimlin Housing Development Sdn Bhd v. Bank Bumiputra Malaysia Bhd & Ors [1997] 1 MLRA 267

Case Summary: Nippon Express (M) Sdn Bhd v. Che Kiang Realty Sdn Bhd & Another Appeal [2014] 1 MLRA 558

1. Case Information Court: Court of Appeal, Putrajaya. Coram: Ramly Ali, Mohtarudin Baki, David Wong Dak Wah JJCA. Decision Date: 16 May 2013. Parties: Nippon Express (M) Sdn Bhd and Nittsu Transport Service (M) Sdn Bhd (Appellants) vs. Che Kiang Realty Sdn Bhd (Respondent). 2. Background and Facts On 5 June 1997, the appellants signed Purchase Forms and Offers to Purchase for … Continue reading Case Summary: Nippon Express (M) Sdn Bhd v. Che Kiang Realty Sdn Bhd & Another Appeal [2014] 1 MLRA 558

Case Summary: Perak Integrated Network Services Sdn Bhd v. Pins Osc & Maintenance Services Sdn Bhd & Anor and Other Appeals [2026] 3 MLRA 1

1. Background and Facts Urban Domain Sdn Bhd (UDSB) initiated a common-law derivative action on behalf of PINS OSC & Maintenance Services Sdn Bhd (OSC), a joint-venture company, against Perak Integrated Network Services Sdn Bhd (PINS) for "loss of profit arising out of a breach of a Management Agreement ('MA') and First Supplemental Agreement ('1st SMA')". PINS … Continue reading Case Summary: Perak Integrated Network Services Sdn Bhd v. Pins Osc & Maintenance Services Sdn Bhd & Anor and Other Appeals [2026] 3 MLRA 1

Case Summary: Lim Chon Jet @ Lim Chon Jat & Ors v. Wee Ai Hua & Anor [2023] 1 MLRA 464

1. Overview This case involved an appeal by 46 house buyers (Appellants) against a High Court decision that dismissed their claim to enforce a statutory guarantee and indemnity against the directors (Respondents) of a developer company, Yusen Jaya Sdn Bhd. The Appellants sought to recover a judgment sum of RM4,593,372.67 previously awarded against the developer for structural defects and late delivery. 2. … Continue reading Case Summary: Lim Chon Jet @ Lim Chon Jat & Ors v. Wee Ai Hua & Anor [2023] 1 MLRA 464

Contempt of Court: Key Lessons from a 13-Year Case Delay

The landmark case of Folin & Brothers Sdn Bhd (in liquidation) v. Wong Boon Sun & Ors [2009] 4 MLRA 170 CA serves as a vital reminder to legal practitioners about the scrupulous adherence required when navigating the "treacherous waters" of contempt proceedings. Because contempt is quasi-criminal and involves the potential loss of liberty, Malaysian courts do not tolerate vague allegations … Continue reading Contempt of Court: Key Lessons from a 13-Year Case Delay