Category: Uncategorized

Case Analysis: MT Ventures Sdn Bhd & Anor v. QM Print Sdn Bhd And Another Appeal [2025 6 MLRA 595 FC Court: Federal Court, Putrajaya.Judges: Nallini Pathmanathan, Rhodzariah Bujang, Hanipah Farikullah FCJJ. 1. Introduction The landmark decision in MT Ventures Sdn Bhd & Anor v. QM Print Sdn Bhd addresses the controversial 2022 amendment to … Continue reading Case Analysis: MT Ventures Sdn Bhd & Anor v. QM Print Sdn Bhd And Another Appeal [2025 6 MLRA 595 FC →

Case Analysis: Eu Boon Yeap & Ors v. Ewe Kean Hoe [2007] 2 MLRA 533 Court: Court of Appeal, Putrajaya. Judges: Mokhtar Sidin, Low Hop Bing, Raus Sharif JJCA.  1. Introduction This case is a seminal Court of Appeal authority regarding the onus probandi (burden of proof) in probate actions. It specifically delineates the responsibilities of a propounder of a will to establish testamentary capacity and … Continue reading Case Analysis: Eu Boon Yeap & Ors v. Ewe Kean Hoe [2007] 2 MLRA 533 →

Case Analysis: Kosma Palm Oil Mill Sdn Bhd & Ors v. Koperasi Serbausaha Makmur Bhd [2004] 1 MLJ 257 Court: Federal Court, Malaysia.  Subject Matter: Civil Procedure; Stay of Execution pending appeal. 1. Introduction The Federal Court decision in Kosma Palm Oil Mill Sdn Bhd & Ors v. Koperasi Serbausaha Makmur Bhd is the definitive Malaysian authority governing the discretionary power of the … Continue reading Case Analysis: Kosma Palm Oil Mill Sdn Bhd & Ors v. Koperasi Serbausaha Makmur Bhd [2004] 1 MLJ 257 FC →

Case Analysis: Faustina Anne Sta Maria v. Mary Patricia De Cruz [2024] 1 MLRA 228 CA Court: Court of Appeal, PutrajayaJudges: Supang Lian, M Gunalan, Azizul Azmi Adnan JJCA 1. Introduction This significant Court of Appeal decision addresses the nature of a beneficiary's interest in an unadministered intestate estate. The case clarifies whether the rights … Continue reading Case Analysis: Faustina Anne Sta Maria v. Mary Patricia De Cruz [2024] 1 MLRA 228 CA →

Case Analysis: Latifah Mat Zin v. Rosmawati Sharibun & Anor [2007] 1 MLRA 847 FC Court: Federal Court, Putrajaya. Judges: Abdul Hamid Mohamad, Ariffin Zakaria, Augustine Paul FCJJ.  1. Introduction This landmark Federal Court decision is the definitive authority on the demarcation of jurisdiction between Malaysia’s Civil Courts and Syariah Courts under Article 121(1A) of the Federal Constitution. It provides a comprehensive framework for resolving disputes that involve … Continue reading Case Analysis: Latifah Mat Zin v. Rosmawati Sharibun & Anor [2007] 1 MLRA 847 FC →

Wishing you a magnificent Year of the Horse! May 2026 be a year of galloping progress and great breakthroughs. May you enjoy '马到功成' (success upon the arrival of the horse) in all your endeavors. Happy New Year!

The case of Syarikat Wing Heong Meat Product Sdn Bhd v. Wing Heong Food Industries & Ors [2009] 1 MLRH 947 HC is a significant Malaysian authority concerning implied actual authority, the transfer of business goodwill, and the application of the Duomatic principle in the context of an informal family-run enterprise. 1. Case Background The dispute centered on a well-known dried … Continue reading Syarikat Wing Heong Meat Product Sdn Bhd v. Wing Heong Food Industries & Ors [2009] 1 MLRH 947 HC →

Case Analysis: Yap Teck Ngian v. Yap Hong Lang & Ors [2007] 1 MLRA 869 Court: Federal Court, Putrajaya. Judges: Alauddin Mohd Sheriff, Nik Hashim, Hashim Yusoff FCJJ. Citation: [2007] 1 MLRA 869; 5 MLJ 756; 5 CLJ 290. 1. Introduction This landmark Federal Court decision is the definitive authority in Malaysian probate law regarding the procedural prerequisites for initiating a contentious probate action. The … Continue reading Case analysis: Yap Teck Ngian v. Yap Hong Lang & Ors [2007] 1 MLRA 869 FC →

The Federal Court case of Setiakon Engineering Sdn Bhd v. Mak Yan Tai & Anor 5 MLRA 791 is a landmark decision concerning the indefeasibility of land title under the National Land Code (NLC) and the legal consequences of setting aside a judgment used to effect a fraudulent transfer. 1. Background Facts The original registered … Continue reading Case Analysis: Setiakon Engineering Sdn Bhd v. Mak Yan Tai & Anor [2024] 5 MLRA 791 FC →

1. Case Information Court: Supreme Court (Kuala Lumpur) Judges: Chong Siew Fai CJ (Sabah & Sarawak), Peh Swee Chun FCJ, and Shaik Daud JCA Date of Judgment: 22 September 1995 Parties: Asia Commercial Finance (M) Bhd (Appellant/Finance Company) v Kawal Teliti Sdn Bhd (Respondent/Borrower) 2. Synopsis of Facts The appellant granted the respondent a fixed loan of RM750,000 to finance a … Continue reading Case Analysis: Asia Commercial Finance (M) Bhd v Kawal Teliti Sdn Bhd [1995] 3 MLJ 189 SC →