Case Analysis: Press Metal Sarawak Sdn Bhd v. Etiqa Takaful Berhad [2016] 5 MLRA 529

The case of Press Metal Sarawak Sdn Bhd v. Etiqa Takaful Berhad [2016] 5 MLRA 529 is a landmark Federal Court decision that serves as a cornerstone for minimal curial intervention and a robust pro-arbitration stance in Malaysia. The ruling clarified the mandatory nature of stays under the amended Arbitration Act 2005 and established how arbitration clauses can be validly incorporated by … Continue reading Case Analysis: Press Metal Sarawak Sdn Bhd v. Etiqa Takaful Berhad [2016] 5 MLRA 529

Key Takeaways from Icon City v. Lee Kean Hwa Case

The case of Icon City Development Sdn Bhd v. Lee Kean Hwa & Ors [2026] 1 MLRA 131 FC is a landmark Federal Court ruling regarding the interpretation of Sale and Purchase Agreements (SPAs) for commercial properties—specifically, how to calculate the deadline for delivering vacant possession and the resulting liquidated damages (LD) for delays. 1. Case Background … Continue reading Key Takeaways from Icon City v. Lee Kean Hwa Case

Case Analysis: Sime Darby Bhd & Ors v. Dato’ Seri Ahmad Zubair @ Ahmad Zubir bin Hj Murshid & Ors (Tun Musa Hitam & Ors, third parties) [2012] 9 MLJ 464

The case of Sime Darby Bhd & Ors v. Dato' Seri Ahmad Zubair @ Ahmad Zubir bin Hj Murshid & Ors (Tun Musa Hitam & Ors, third parties) [2012] 9 MLJ 464 (also reported as 2 MLRH 466) is a significant authority in Malaysian company and procedural law, particularly concerning fiduciary duties among co-directors and the limitations of third-party proceedings for … Continue reading Case Analysis: Sime Darby Bhd & Ors v. Dato’ Seri Ahmad Zubair @ Ahmad Zubir bin Hj Murshid & Ors (Tun Musa Hitam & Ors, third parties) [2012] 9 MLJ 464

Case Analysis: Pestech Technology Sdn Bhd & Anor v. Syarikat Pembenaan Yeoh Tiong Lay Sdn Bhd [2025] 6 MLRH 562

The case of Pestech Technology Sdn Bhd & Anor v. Syarikat Pembenaan Yeoh Tiong Lay Sdn Bhd [2025] 6 MLRH 562 is a significant High Court decision that reinforces the mandatory nature of arbitration stays and the doctrine of estoppel by conduct in alternative dispute resolution. 1. Case Information Court: High Court Malaya, Kuala Lumpur. Citation: [2025] 6 MLRH 562. Parties: Pestech … Continue reading Case Analysis: Pestech Technology Sdn Bhd & Anor v. Syarikat Pembenaan Yeoh Tiong Lay Sdn Bhd [2025] 6 MLRH 562

Case Analysis: Fullji Realty Sdn Bhd v. Lim Yong Meng [2007] 3 MLJ 39

The case of Fullji Realty Sdn Bhd v. Lim Yong Meng serves as a foundational authority in Malaysian law regarding the breach of warranty of authority by solicitors and the procedural nature of third-party proceedings. Although the judgment was delivered ex post facto following a settlement between the parties, it provides a comprehensive judicial illustration of how such disputes are adjudicated. 1. … Continue reading Case Analysis: Fullji Realty Sdn Bhd v. Lim Yong Meng [2007] 3 MLJ 39

Case Analysis: Country Garden Danga Bay Sdn Bhd v. Tribunal Tuntutan Pembeli Rumah & Anor [2022] 5 MLRA 38

Country Garden Danga Bay Sdn Bhd v. Tribunal Tuntutan Pembeli Rumah is a landmark Federal Court decision that clarifies the jurisdictional limits of the Tribunal for Homebuyer Claims and reinforces the doctrine of estoppel by conduct in the context of statutory housing contracts. 1. Case Information Court: Federal Court, Putrajaya. Citation: [2022] 5 MLRA 38. Parties: Country Garden Danga Bay Sdn Bhd (Appellant/Developer) … Continue reading Case Analysis: Country Garden Danga Bay Sdn Bhd v. Tribunal Tuntutan Pembeli Rumah & Anor [2022] 5 MLRA 38

Case Analysis: Pioneer Haven Sdn Bhd v. Ho Hup Construction Company Berhad & Anor and other appeals [2012] 4 MLRA 210 CA

The case of Pioneer Haven Sdn Bhd v. Ho Hup Construction Company Berhad & Anor and other appeals [2012] 4 MLRA 210 CA is a definitive authority in Malaysian company law concerning the "proper plaintiff rule," the interpretation of "disposal" under Section 132C of the Companies Act 1965, and the application of the Business Judgment Rule. 1. Case Overview Court: Court of Appeal, … Continue reading Case Analysis: Pioneer Haven Sdn Bhd v. Ho Hup Construction Company Berhad & Anor and other appeals [2012] 4 MLRA 210 CA

Protasco Bhd v. Tey Por Yee & Another Appeal [2018] 6 MLRA 674 CA

The case of Protasco Bhd v. Tey Por Yee & Another Appeal [2018] 6 MLRA 674 CA is a seminal decision by the Malaysian Court of Appeal regarding the jurisdictional boundaries between court proceedings and arbitration, particularly when a dispute involves non-parties to an arbitration agreement. 1. Case Information Court: Court of Appeal, Putrajaya. Citation: [2018] 6 MLRA 674. Parties: Protasco Bhd (Appellant/Plaintiff) … Continue reading Protasco Bhd v. Tey Por Yee & Another Appeal [2018] 6 MLRA 674 CA

Sim Chio Huat v. Wong Ted Fui [1982] 1 MLRA 379 FC

The case of Sim Chio Huat v. Wong Ted Fui [1982] 1 MLRA 379 FC is a seminal Federal Court authority in Malaysian contract law regarding the waiver of time stipulations, the concept of "time at large," and the prevention principle in construction disputes. 1. Case Information Court: Federal Court, Kuching. Citation: [1982] 1 MLRA 379. Parties: Sim Chio Huat (Appellant/Developer) and Wong Ted Fui … Continue reading Sim Chio Huat v. Wong Ted Fui [1982] 1 MLRA 379 FC