Skip to content
  • Home
  • Our Services
  • Commissioner for Oaths
  • Our Partners
  • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • Search

Vooi & Yee | Advocates & Solicitors | Commissioner For Oaths @ Johor Bahru, Malaysia

Advocates & Solicitors | Peguambela & Peguamcara | Commissioner For Oaths | Pesuruhjaya Sumpah | Lawyer | @ Johor Bahru, Malaysia | law firm legal

Category: Uncategorized

Quote of the day

Posted on 20/06/202227/01/2022 by nickvooi in Uncategorized

“In order that a party may free himself from complying with an agreement he had entered into, he must show that the bargain or some of its terms was unfair and unconscionable. It is not enough to show that, in the eyes of the court, it was unreasonable. A bargain cannot be unfair and unconscionable … Continue reading Quote of the day →

Leave a comment

Quote of the day

Posted on 19/06/202227/01/2022 by nickvooi in Uncategorized

"… that every man should be held to his bargain if there is a concluded agreement and the terms are clear. It is implicit from what the appellant has himself stated in his affidavit, that the sufficiency of 30 days notice was on his mind when he signed the agreement He was therefore fully aware … Continue reading Quote of the day →

Leave a comment

Quote of the day

Posted on 18/06/202227/01/2022 by nickvooi in Uncategorized

"In deciding whether the parties have reached an agreement, the law looks for an offer by one party and an acceptance to the terms and conditions of that offer by the other. There would be bargaining process leading up ultimately to an agreement or meeting of the minds. This is the traditional method of analysis … Continue reading Quote of the day →

Leave a comment

Quote of the day

Posted on 17/06/202227/01/2022 by nickvooi in Uncategorized

“To constitute a valid contract there must be separate and definite parties thereto; those parties must be in agreement, that is there must be a consensus ad idem; those parties must intend to create legal relations in the sense that the promises of each side are to be enforceable simply because they are contractual promises … Continue reading Quote of the day →

Leave a comment

Quote of the day

Posted on 16/06/202227/01/2022 by nickvooi in Uncategorized

"… a party to a contract who, after having concluded his bargain, entertains doubts as to the wisdom of the transaction may be in the unfairly advantageous position to invent all sorts of imaginary terms upon which disagreement may be expressed when the more formal document is being prepared in order to escape from his … Continue reading Quote of the day →

Leave a comment

Quote of the day

Posted on 15/06/202227/01/2022 by nickvooi in Uncategorized

"The law of contract is concerned with the mechanics involved in and the principles regulating the formation, performance, continuance and discharge of the parties individually created obligations. The essential elements of any contract are:

Leave a comment

Quote of the day

Posted on 14/06/202224/01/2022 by nickvooi in Uncategorized

"Let the punishment match the offence." Cicero

Leave a comment

Quote of the day

Posted on 13/06/202224/01/2022 by nickvooi in Uncategorized

"Those who wish to appear wise among fools, among the wise seem foolish." Marcus Fabius Quintilianus

Leave a comment

Quote of the day

Posted on 12/06/202224/01/2022 by nickvooi in Uncategorized

"You are young, my son, and as the years go by, time will change and even reverse many of your present opinions. Refrain therefore awhile from setting yourself up as a judge of the highest matters." Plato

Leave a comment

Quote of the day

Posted on 11/06/202224/01/2022 by nickvooi in Uncategorized

"Time is a great legalizer, even in the field of morals." H. L. Mencken

Leave a comment

Posts navigation

Older Posts
Newer posts
  • Case Analysis : NEWLAKE DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD v. ZENITH DELIGHT SDN BHD & ORS [2026] MLRAU 11 CA
    This case analysis examines the Court of Appeal’s decision in Newlake Development Sdn Bhd v. Zenith Delight Sdn Bhd & Ors MLRAU 11, which overturned a High Court ruling and allowed the plaintiff’s claims for fraud, fraudulent misrepresentation, and breach of trust. Executive Summary The Court of Appeal (COA) found that the defendants engaged in a series … Continue reading Case Analysis : NEWLAKE DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD v. ZENITH DELIGHT SDN BHD & ORS [2026] MLRAU 11 CA →
  • The Four Key Principles of Defamation Claims
    1. Introduction: The Strategic Importance of Reputation in a Civil Society In the theater of civil litigation, reputation is frequently dismissed by the uninitiated as a mere personal asset. For the seasoned practitioner, however, it is understood as a fundamental component of human dignity and a cornerstone of the public interest. As articulated in Reynolds v … Continue reading The Four Key Principles of Defamation Claims →
  • Case Analysis: Lai Yoke Ngan & Anor v Chin Teck Kwee & Anor [1997] 2 MLJ 565 FC
    DetailDescriptionCourtFederal Court (Kuala Lumpur)Citation[1997] 2 MLJ 565PartiesAppellants (Plaintiffs): Lai Yoke Ngan & Anor (Executors of the deceased's estate)Respondents (Defendants): Chin Teck Kwee & Anor (Beneficiaries/Children of the deceased and first plaintiff)Subject MatterA family dispute over the ownership and management of the Tampin Sawmill. The appeals concerned the setting aside of a default judgment and the striking … Continue reading Case Analysis: Lai Yoke Ngan & Anor v Chin Teck Kwee & Anor [1997] 2 MLJ 565 FC →
  • Case Analysis: Lee Ah Chor v Southern Bank Bhd [1991] 1 MLJ 428 SC
    DetailDescriptionCase NameLee Ah Chor v Southern Bank BhdCitation[1991] 1 MLJ 428CourtSupreme Court (Kuala Lumpur)CoramAbdul Hamid Omar LP, Gunn Chit Tuan and Jemuri Serjan SCJJDate of Judgment10 December 1990 Brief Facts: The respondent (Southern Bank Bhd) granted an overdraft facility of $700,000 to a company (Sin Hup Woh Transport and Trading Agencies Company Bhd). This facility … Continue reading Case Analysis: Lee Ah Chor v Southern Bank Bhd [1991] 1 MLJ 428 SC →
  • Case Analysis: Hock Hua Bank Bhd. v. Sahari Bin Murid [1981] 1 MLJ 143 FC
    DetailInformationCase NameHock Hua Bank Bhd. v. Sahari Bin MuridCourtFederal CourtDate of JudgmentSeptember 10 & October 13, 1980AppellantHock Hua Bank Bhd. (The Bank/Chargee)RespondentSahari Bin Murid (The Chargor)Core IssueWhether a judge has the jurisdiction to alter or set aside a judgment or order that was regularly obtained, drawn up, and perfected in an inter partes application (one where both … Continue reading Case Analysis: Hock Hua Bank Bhd. v. Sahari Bin Murid [1981] 1 MLJ 143 FC →

Local News: Malaysia

  • Be more pro-active sharing info on skills training opportunities, Ramanan urges youth
  • Cops seek help finding missing teen last seen heading for Bentong Ramadan bazaar
  • MCMC studying various methods to verify minimum age for social media, says Deputy Comms Minister
  • Thunderstorms, heavy rain to hit seven states, KL until 9pm
  • PM: Spend prudently, be vigilant of global economic uncertainties

BBC NEWS: WORLD

  • Heavy rains and flooding kills at least 23 in Nairobi
  • Russian strike on Kharkiv apartment block kills seven
  • We've been speaking to Iranians during one week of war. Here's what they said
  • Swiss to vote on right-wing push to slash licence fee for public broadcaster
  • Trump demands 'unconditional surrender' from Iran as Putin speaks with Iran's president

21,996 hits

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Vooi & Yee | Advocates & Solicitors | Commissioner For Oaths @ Johor Bahru, Malaysia
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Vooi & Yee | Advocates & Solicitors | Commissioner For Oaths @ Johor Bahru, Malaysia
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...