Category: Uncategorized

1. Case Information Court: Court of Appeal, Putrajaya. Coram: Ramly Ali, Mohtarudin Baki, David Wong Dak Wah JJCA. Decision Date: 16 May 2013. Parties: Nippon Express (M) Sdn Bhd and Nittsu Transport Service (M) Sdn Bhd (Appellants) vs. Che Kiang Realty Sdn Bhd (Respondent). 2. Background and Facts On 5 June 1997, the appellants signed Purchase Forms and Offers to Purchase for … Continue reading Case Summary: Nippon Express (M) Sdn Bhd v. Che Kiang Realty Sdn Bhd & Another Appeal [2014] 1 MLRA 558 →

1. Background and Facts Urban Domain Sdn Bhd (UDSB) initiated a common-law derivative action on behalf of PINS OSC & Maintenance Services Sdn Bhd (OSC), a joint-venture company, against Perak Integrated Network Services Sdn Bhd (PINS) for "loss of profit arising out of a breach of a Management Agreement ('MA') and First Supplemental Agreement ('1st SMA')". PINS … Continue reading Case Summary: Perak Integrated Network Services Sdn Bhd v. Pins Osc & Maintenance Services Sdn Bhd & Anor and Other Appeals [2026] 3 MLRA 1 →

1. Overview This case involved an appeal by 46 house buyers (Appellants) against a High Court decision that dismissed their claim to enforce a statutory guarantee and indemnity against the directors (Respondents) of a developer company, Yusen Jaya Sdn Bhd. The Appellants sought to recover a judgment sum of RM4,593,372.67 previously awarded against the developer for structural defects and late delivery. 2. … Continue reading Case Summary: Lim Chon Jet @ Lim Chon Jat & Ors v. Wee Ai Hua & Anor [2023] 1 MLRA 464 →

The landmark case of Folin & Brothers Sdn Bhd (in liquidation) v. Wong Boon Sun & Ors [2009] 4 MLRA 170 CA serves as a vital reminder to legal practitioners about the scrupulous adherence required when navigating the "treacherous waters" of contempt proceedings. Because contempt is quasi-criminal and involves the potential loss of liberty, Malaysian courts do not tolerate vague allegations … Continue reading Contempt of Court: Key Lessons from a 13-Year Case Delay →

The Court of Appeal decision in Inter Heritage (M) Sdn Bhd v. Asa Sports Sdn Bhd [2008] 3 MLRA 122 CA serves as a critical reminder for legal practitioners and businesses regarding the strict requirements for obtaining and enforcing injunctions in Malaysia. Case Summary The plaintiff, the owner of the Sheraton Imperial Kuala Lumpur, entered into a … Continue reading Case Summary: Inter Heritage (M) Sdn Bhd v. Asa Sports Sdn Bhd [2008] 3 MLRA 122 CA →

In the case of Projek Lebuh Raya Utara-Selatan Sdn Bhd v. Kim Seng Enterprise (Kedah) Sdn Bhd [2013] 4 MLRA 68 CA, the Court of Appeal overturned a High Court decision that had initially found the appellant (PLUS) liable for breach of contract and negligence regarding remedial works following a landslide.+3 Case Summary Background: The respondent owned … Continue reading Case Summary: Projek Lebuh Raya Utara-Selatan Sdn Bhd v. Kim Seng Enterprise (Kedah) Sdn Bhd [2013] 4 MLRA 68 CA →

Case Summary: Syarikat Perniagaan Selangor Sdn Bhd v Fahro Rozi Mohdi & Ors [1981] 1 MLRA 571 FC Court: Federal Court, Kuala Lumpur.Judges: Chang Min Tat J, Salleh Abas J, & Abdul Hamid FJJ.Date: 30 January 1981. Background The appellant held a lease for approximately 8.5 acres of land designated for use as a tourist … Continue reading Case Summary: Syarikat Perniagaan Selangor Sdn Bhd v Fahro Rozi Mohdi & Ors [1981] 1 MLRA 571 FC →

This case summary of Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd v. Port Kelang Authority [2025] 3 MLRA 873 highlights a landmark Federal Court decision concerning the necessity of consideration in contract variations and the limits of the "practical benefit" test in Malaysia. 1. Background & Facts The Port Kelang Authority (PKA) appointed Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd (KDSB) as the … Continue reading Case Summary: Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd v. Port Kelang Authority [2025] 3 MLRA 873 FC →

Overview In a landmark decision delivered on February 10, 2026, the Federal Court of Malaysia restored the conviction of former FELDA Chairman, Tan Sri Mohd Isa Abdul Samad, on nine counts of receiving bribes. This ruling overturned an earlier acquittal by the Court of Appeal and reaffirmed the High Court’s original findings regarding the receipt … Continue reading Case Summary: PP v. Mohd Isa Abdul Samad [2026] 3 MLRA 274 FC →

Case Background The respondent (Hi-Summit Construction) initiated a suit against the three appellant companies, alleging that a 19% share or equity interest in a valuable highway concession (the Maju Expressway) had been unlawfully transferred from the respondent to the 1st appellant. During the High Court proceedings, the appellants raised a preliminary objection orally from the bar, challenging the authority of … Continue reading Case Analysis: Ulimas Sdn Bhd v. Hi-Summit Construction Sdn Bhd & Other Appeals [2017] 2 MLRA 333 FC →