Re Cyril Sharpe [1992] FCA 616, per Drummond J in the Federal Court of Australia: The taking of an account is only appropriate once it has been established that the parties involved are in an accounting relationship with each other, that it, only once it has been established that one party is liable to pay … Continue reading Re Cyril Sharpe [1992] FCA 616
Tag: CaseLaws
Baboo Janokey Doss v Damoder Das [1843] Moore Ind App 175
In Baboo Janokey Doss v Damoder Das [1843] Moore Ind App 175, Dr Lushington of the Privy Council ruled: Again, it must be remembered that the decree cannot stand unless it be first clearly proved that the appellants are, if anything should be found due to the respondents arising from the acts and dealings of … Continue reading Baboo Janokey Doss v Damoder Das [1843] Moore Ind App 175
Alcatel-Lucent (M) Sdn Bhd (formerly known as Alcatel Network Systems (M) Sdn Bhd) v Solid Investments Ltd and another appeal [2012) 4 MLJ 72 CA
Alcatel-Lucent (M) Sdn Bhd (formerly known as Alcatel Network Systems (M) Sdn Bhd) v Solid Investments Ltd and another appeal [2012) 4 MLJ 72 CA: [27] The remedy of account is personal against the accounting party and does not create any trust or equitable interest in the property. In the present case, the appellant is … Continue reading Alcatel-Lucent (M) Sdn Bhd (formerly known as Alcatel Network Systems (M) Sdn Bhd) v Solid Investments Ltd and another appeal [2012) 4 MLJ 72 CA
Alcatel-Lucent (M) Sdn Bhd (formerly known as Alcatel Network Systems (M) Sdn Bhd) v Solid Investments Ltd and another appeal [2012] 4 MLJ 72 CA
Alcatel-Lucent (M) Sdn Bhd (formerly known as Alcatel Network Systems (M) Sdn Bhd) v Solid Investments Ltd and another appeal [2012] 4 MLJ 72 CA [13] It is settled law that the corporate veil of a company should not be lifted lightly as the concept of separate legal entity is a cornerstone of company law … Continue reading Alcatel-Lucent (M) Sdn Bhd (formerly known as Alcatel Network Systems (M) Sdn Bhd) v Solid Investments Ltd and another appeal [2012] 4 MLJ 72 CA
