Skip to content

Home
Our Services
Commissioner for Oaths
Our Partners
Contact Us
Blog
Search

Vooi & Yee | Law Firm | Commissioner For Oaths @ Johor Bahru, Malaysia

Advocates & Solicitors | Peguambela & Peguamcara | Commissioner For Oaths | Pesuruhjaya Sumpah | Lawyer | @ Johor Bahru, Malaysia | Legal Firm

Daulat Tuanku!

Posted on 06/06/202209/04/2022 by nickvooi in Uncategorized

Share this:

X
Facebook

Like Loading...

Related

Published by nickvooi

View all posts by nickvooi

Post navigation

Previous Post Quote of the day

Next Post Quote of the day

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Δ

Search

Case Law Summary: Damien Thaman Divean & Anor v. Majlis Eksekutif Negeri Selangor Darul Ehsan (EXCO) & Ors
Citation: [2026] 4 MLRA 201Court: Federal Court, PutrajayaJudges: Abu Bakar Jais PCA, Rhodzariah Bujang, and Lee Swee Seng FCJJDate of Judgment: 1 April 2026 1. Brief Background Facts On 20 November 2000, the Selangor State Executive Council (1st respondent) decided to de-gazette 406.22 hectares of the Bukit Cherakah Forest Reserve for development. Between 2001 and 2016, large portions of this land were alienated and developed … Continue reading Case Law Summary: Damien Thaman Divean & Anor v. Majlis Eksekutif Negeri Selangor Darul Ehsan (EXCO) & Ors →
Case Law Summary: Ketua Pengarah Pendaftaran Negara & Ors v. Tan Jun Yan & Another Appeal [2026] 4 MLRA 82
Citation: [2026]4 MLRA 82Court: Court of Appeal, PutrajayaJudges: Azizah Nawawi CJSS, Mohd Nazlan Ghazali, and Azhahari Kamal Ramli JJCADate of Judgment: 6 March 2026 1. Brief Background Facts Tan Jun Yan (the plaintiff) was born on 20 October 2000 in Puchong, Selangor. Initially, his adoptive father, GC Tan, falsely declared himself and his wife, KF Wong, as the biological … Continue reading Case Law Summary: Ketua Pengarah Pendaftaran Negara & Ors v. Tan Jun Yan & Another Appeal [2026] 4 MLRA 82 →
K Murugesu v. Nadarajah: Executory Consideration Explained
In the commercial world, a common misconception persists: that a contract is only “real” once money changes hands. However, Malaysian jurisprudence—anchored by the landmark Federal Court decision in K Murugesu v. Nadarajah [1980] 1 MLRA 456—firmly establishes that a valid and enforceable agreement can exist the moment mutual promises are exchanged, even if not a single cent … Continue reading K Murugesu v. Nadarajah: Executory Consideration Explained →
Understanding Probationary Employee Rights in Malaysia
The landmark case of Khalif bte Abbas v. Pesaka Capital Corp Sdn Bhd [1997] 1 MLJ 376 is the leading Malaysian authority establishing that employees on probation enjoy the same fundamental rights as permanent or confirmed employees regarding security of tenure. 1. Background and Facts 2. Key Legal Issue The primary issue for determination was whether an employee … Continue reading Understanding Probationary Employee Rights in Malaysia →
Case Summary: K Murugesu v Nadarajah [1980] 1 MLRA 456
1. Factual Background The parties entered into an agreement for the sale and purchase of a house. This agreement was famously written on a “scrap of paper”. Following the signing of the document, the vendor sought to resile from the bargain. The vendor argued that the agreement was void for lack of consideration because, at the time of signing, … Continue reading Case Summary: K Murugesu v Nadarajah [1980] 1 MLRA 456 →

BBC NEWS: WORLD

Trump says US to pause operation to guide vessels through Strait of Hormuz
Vivek Ramaswamy wins Republican nomination for Ohio governor
Oil prices ease as US pauses Project Freedom to seek deal with Iran
Apple to pay $250m to iPhone buyers over AI features lawsuit
India's fiercest female politician faces a fight for survival

24,956 hits

Comment
Reblog
Subscribe Subscribed
- Vooi & Yee | Law Firm | Commissioner For Oaths @ Johor Bahru, Malaysia
- Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.

Loading Comments...

Write a Comment...

Email

Name

Website

%d